Joel Krahn/Yukon News People take in the sunset on the clay cliffs in Whitehorse the evening of Aug. 29.

The carbon tax is supposed to incentivize low carbon alternatives

Almost everything government does involves the choosing of so-called “winners” and “losers”

As the feds were in town last week sorting out some of the details of the upcoming carbon tax with the Yukon Government, we have further indications that no “exemption” for the North is in the cards.

Seemingly resigned (finally) to the notion that this is coming one way or another, the opposition has embraced a new line of attack. A refusal by the government to promise that the tax it collected once in place would be “revenue neutral”, not for government, but for individual Yukoners paying it led to criticism that it would be picking winners and losers

If I might move slightly off track for a moment, let us add the expression “pick winners and losers” to our list of meaningless political talking points that ought to be excised from the political discourse. Almost everything government does, whether overtly or more subtly, involves the choosing of so-called “winners” and “losers.”

Yes, since they need to win elections politicians will often go out of their ways to only highlight who stands to gain from a particular move while downplaying the hit suffered by those who lose. But the losers are still there even if they don’t recognize themselves as such. Every dollar spent on a program or policy that doesn’t benefit you in some direct or indirect way makes you a “loser” in some sense. It means less money to spend on those that do benefit you or to return to you in the form of tax cuts.

Ultimately picking winners and losers is what government does. It is not that anyone wants there to be “losers” in the world, but zero sum situations exist and governments have to contend with them.

Returning specifically to carbon pricing, I certainly always understood the expression “revenue neutral” to mean revenue neutral for government (as in it didn’t result in a net increase in revenue), and not revenue neutral among individual payers.

The latter would defeat the purpose of the tax. If you literally returned every dollar and cent to the exact person who paid that tax to begin with it would accomplish nothing. A carbon tax creates winners and losers by design. The point is to create a structure so that the losers want to and can become winners by reducing their emissions.

The tax is supposed to be about incentivizing low carbon alternatives wherever they are available. So yes if you are one who purposely chooses a high carbon lifestyle which provides little in the way of broader economic benefit in the face of reasonably cost effective alternatives you have to “lose” in order for the policy to be effective.

So what principles ought to govern the rebating of carbon tax revenue to Yukoners? This was the subject of one of those online consultations the Yukon Government has been doing recently.

As I’ve argued before, I don’t think carbon pricing should be a “tax grab” or a means to accomplishing some other social policy change. This is why I supported the Liberal promise of revenue neutrality over the NDP promise of splitting the money between rebates for low income households and a green energy fund.

If we are modelling for other jurisdictions around the world that might be considering carbon pricing as an economically efficient mechanism to reduce emission, it behooves us not to prove the critics right by using it to increase the size of government or redistribute wealth from rich to poor.

My view, as it has always been, is that the manner in which the money collected through carbon pricing is rebated should be structured in a way that recognizes that a certain quantity of carbon emissions are unavoidable or cost prohibitive to eliminate. Carbon taxes collected on those emissions ought to be refunded to the payer.

But that doesn’t mean returning every dollar to the person who paid it.

For example, as the former premier constantly felt the need to remind us, home heating is unavoidable in the Yukon. That is absolutely true and it isn’t just low income households that must cope with the increased cost of home heating. It is middle and high income ones as well.

But how much you spend on heating your home is the result of certain choices regarding size, temperature and efficiency. I think there needs to be some sort of flat rebate structured around the number of people living in a household. But that rebate ought to create winners and losers.

Transportation is another one. Most of us have to get to work. Some of us need vehicles – often bigger vehicles – to do our jobs and that ought to be recognized. But if you drive your one ton to your desk job then you may be one of those “losers” under whatever carbon rebate scheme is devised. Drive a fuel efficient car? Maybe you can break even and receive back what you paid. Ride a bike, catch public transit, or carpool? Perhaps the net result of the rebating will make you a “winner.”

There are also certain industries – the placer industry being one commonly cited by my colleague Keith Halliday as a cause for concern – which has to pay big fuel bills that ought to be specifically targeted. But there are going to be differences in level of efficiency between operations as well and we ought to be creative in how we return the money. Perhaps rebates could be a function of the amount of minerals produced rather than the quantity of fuel consumed.

Yes, implementing carbon pricing is going to create some winners and losers. And some of the details are going to be complicated. Let us get those uncomfortable truths out of the way and recognize that not all carbon emissions were created equal. Some are the practically unavoidable consequence of living and working in 2017. Others are the result of our own excess. The key to devising an effective policy will be recognizing he difference.

Kyle Carruthers is a born-and-raised Yukoner who lives and practises law in Whitehorse.

carbon taxYukon

Get local stories you won't find anywhere else right to your inbox.
Sign up here

Just Posted

Mobile vaccine team Team Balto practises vaccine clinic set-up and teardown at Vanier Catholic Secondary School. Mobile vaccine teams are heading out this week to the communities in order to begin Moderna vaccinations. (Haley Ritchie/Yukon News)
Mobile vaccine teams begin community vaccinations

“It’s an all-of-government approach”

The now empty lot at 410 Cook Street in Whitehorse on Jan. 19. As developers move forward with plans for a housing development that would feature 16 micro-units, they are asking city council for a zoning change that would reduce the number of required parking spaces. (Crystal Schick/Yukon News)
Developer asks for zoning change

Would reduce the number of required parking spaces

The Liard First Nation is preparing to enter negotiations for self-governance with the territorial and federal governments. (Jackie Hong/Yukon News file)
Liard First Nation preparing to enter self-governance negotiations with Yukon, federal governments

Chief Stephen Charlie seeking an agreement separate from “dead end” UFA


Wyatt’s World for Jan. 20, 2021

A Copper Ridge resident clears their driveway after a massive over night snowfall in Whitehorse on Nov. 2, 2020. Environment Canada has issued a winter storm warning for the Whitehorse and Haines Junction areas for Jan. 18. (Crystal Schick/Yukon News file)
Winter storm warning for Haines Junction and Whitehorse

Environment Canada says the storm will develop Monday and last until Tuesday

Mayor Dan Curtis listens to a councillor on the phone during a city council meeting in Whitehorse on April 14, 2020. Curtis announced Jan. 14 that he intends to seek nomination to be the Yukon Liberal candidate for Whitehorse Centre in the 2021 territorial election. (Crystal Schick/Yukon News)
Whitehorse mayor seeking nomination for territorial election

Whitehorse mayor Dan Curtis is preparing for a run in the upcoming… Continue reading

Gerard Redinger was charged under the <em>Civil Emergency Measures Act</em> with failing to self-isolate and failing to transit through the Yukon in under 24 hours. (Joel Krahn/Yukon News file)
Man ticketed $1,150 at Wolf Creek campground for failing to self-isolate

Gerard Redinger signed a 24-hour transit declaration, ticketed 13 days later

Yukon Energy, Solvest Inc. and Chu Níikwän Development Corporation are calling on the city for a meeting to look at possibilities for separate tax rates or incentives for renewable energy projects. (Crystal Schick/Yukon News file)
Tax changes sought for Whitehorse energy projects

Delegates call for separate property tax category for renewable energy projects

Yukon University has added seven members to its board of governors in recent months. (Crystal Schick/Yukon News file)
New members named to Yukon U’s board of governors

Required number of board members now up to 17

Yukonomist Keith Halliday
Yukonomist: Your Northern regulatory adventure awaits!

“Your Northern adventure awaits!” blared the headline on a recent YESAB assessment… Continue reading

Yukoner Shirley Chua-Tan is taking on the role of vice-chair of the social inclusion working group with the Canadian Academy of Health Sciences’ oversight panel and working groups for the autism assessment. (Submitted)
Canadian Academy of Health Sciences names Yukoner to panel

Shirley Chua-Tan is well-known for a number of roles she plays in… Continue reading

The Fish Lake area viewed from the top of Haeckel Hill on Sept. 11, 2018. The Yukon government and Kwanlin Dün First Nation (KDFN) announced they are in the beginning stages of a local area planning process for the area. (Crystal Schick/Yukon News file)
Local area planning for Fish Lake announced

The Government of Yukon and Kwanlin Dün First Nation (KDFN) announced in… Continue reading

Most Read