Two reasons for a Yukon forest act

The primary reason for creating the Yukon Forest Resources Act is to regulate the cutting of trees. This is as it should be.

The primary reason for creating the Yukon Forest Resources Act is to regulate the cutting of trees.

This is as it should be.

Other forest-based industries in the Yukon have their own acts that regulate their activities and impacts.

The other reason for creating the Yukon Forest Resources Act is to minimize the impacts of cutting trees on other people who use the forest and on the countless inherent values or ecological services that our forests give us — like wildlife habitat, water, medicinal plants, biological diversity and clean air.

We need trees, but trees don’t need us.

This is why the harvesting rights section of the Yukon forest act needs to be right.

It should include words like: sustainability, local manufacturing, local employment, local markets, value-added wood products, and appropriate size (for the community).

These words are at the base of a viable and long-lasting timber industry in the Yukon.

They will bring the Yukon closer to being carbon neutral and they help look after other values in Yukon forests.

These words should be liberally sprinkled through this section of the draft act.

They’re not.

Ideally, a sustainable cutting level is based on a regional forest management plan that has identified areas where logging can occur, after deciding how to take care of the other forest values in the area. But, there will be occasions when there is a proposal to cut trees in an area without an approved forest management plan. Then what?

On page 19 of the draft act, it is proposed that “the minister will need to set a limit on harvesting until there is one (a forest management plan).”

It seems reasonable that the minister would use specific criteria to set the limit in a way that assures the Yukon public that the amount of timber being cut in an area without a forest management plan is likely not exceeding sustainable levels.

This is not the case.

Perhaps the Yukon government will include criteria in the regulations.

We don’t know this right now and we won’t know until after the regulations have been approved because the Yukon public and stakeholders will not be consulted on the regulations.

So, the legislation itself must contain the criteria that will guide the minister in setting a sustainable harvest level.

The harvesting rights section of the draft act also proposes five circumstances when an authorization or permit is not necessary before cutting trees (page 15 of the draft act).

From our perspective, two of the exceptions could lead to a significant number of trees being cut, with no way of tracking where and how much wood is actually being cut.

Over time, cutting in these specific areas may exceed sustainable levels. But, with no permit, how would we even know where to look?

Sustainability in a forest act is all about recognizing that there are many values in the forest and that care must be taken to protect these values to the best of our understanding, including timber.

We hope that the Yukon forest act will enable Yukon businesses to produce a variety of value-added wood products for the local market and beyond, and that they will do so for a long time.

But, after reading the draft act over and over again, we’re not so sure.

Next week we will discuss the other words that we have suggested are the backbone of a healthy Yukon forest industry: local manufacturing, local employment, local markets, value-added products, and the right size.

The Forest Values Focus Group formed to contribute our experience and knowledge to the new Yukon Forest act. We represent diverse forest values, rather than organizational mandates. We would like to share the knowledge and information we have collected over the past two and a half years as we have reviewed discussion documents related to the development of the forest act. If you or an organization you are affiliated with would like to meet with representatives of the Forest Values Focus Group, please contact Sue at 668-5678. For more information about the Forest Values Focus Group please visit our website at: http://yukonforestvalues.yk.net/.

This is the fifth article in a series that will discuss important issues for you to consider as you assess the draft Yukon Forest Resources Act.

Just Posted

Poor Creature, Yukonstruct have their day in court

Lawyers for each side accused the other of misrepresenting the situation

Second attempted murder charge laid in downtown Whitehorse shooting

Two men are now facing a total of 17 charges in relation to the shooting outside the Elite Hotel

Child Development Centre marks 40 years of service

CDC now serves families throughout the territory

Triple J’s expands offerings with new skin care line

The products feature Canadian ingredients and environmentally-friendly packaging

Relatives of pedestrian struck in 2001 urge change after latest fatality at the intersection

‘I don’t know what the solution is, but I just think something needs to be done’

Arctic Sports Inter-School Championship draws athletes from as far as Juneau

The three-day event included more than 300 participants from kindergarten to Grade 12

Access road to Telegraph Creek now open

Ministry has spent $300K to date on work to clear rockslide

Freedom Trails responds to lawsuit

A statement of defence was to the Yukon Supreme Court on Nov. 19.

Whitehorse RCMP seeking suspects after robbery at Yukon Inn

Robbery took place in early hours of Nov. 27, with suspects armed with a knife and “large stick”

Yukonomist: Your yogurt container’s dirty secret

You should still recycle, but recycling one might be giving you a false sense of environmental virtue

History Hunter: New book tells old story of nursing in the Yukon

Author Amy Wilson was a registered nurse in the Yukon from 1949 to 1951

Jack Hulland wins 2019 Yukon Elementary School Hockey Tournament

The one-day tournament featured nearly a dozen teams from Whitehorse, Dawson City and Teslin

City news, briefly

Some of the decisions that were made at the Nov. 25 Whitehorse city council meeting

Most Read