City working plan backwards

The city of Whitehorse is inviting comments on the 2010 Official Community Plan. This plan is a guide to development and planning for the next decade or so. It is a vision of what citizens want to see done with the physical layout of their community.

The city of Whitehorse is inviting comments on the 2010 Official Community Plan.

This plan is a guide to development and planning for the next decade or so.

It is a vision of what citizens want to see done with the physical layout of their community.

While not carved in stone this plan should ideally provide a positive direction for the city.

For example, it should dictate what areas get turned into parkland, where future subdivisions should go and how dense the downtown core can be.

A big part of the plan is land use designation.

But there is one slight problem with land use designation within the city of Whitehorse limits.

While the city continues to plan where parks, green spaces and subdivisions go, anyone who wants to can stake hard rock mineral claims in these areas.

This concept of mining free entry, the right to stake almost everywhere, is based on the assumption that mining is the first and best possible use of the land.

Try telling that to a bunch of would-be homeowners who would much rather have houses and gardens on the land instead.

To its credit the city does recognize the problem but the solution being offered is somewhat lacking in gusto.

The city is thinking of writing a letter to the Yukon government about a potential future moratorium on mineral staking.

That is right, folks, the plan actually contemplates the city possibly considering doing something.

To be fair the wording of Section 1.5 of the plan goes partially as follows.

“The City may request the Yukon Government to place a moratorium on future mineral staking within City Limits in order to determine if a partial or total withdrawal of future mineral staking should be implemented.”

This is not bold decision making.

While the city dithers on whether to ask the Yukon government for the temporary moratorium staking can continue thus possibly negating other aspects of the Official Community Plan.

One only has to look at Dawson City to see how staking and subdivisions can get into conflict.

A small subdivision on the Dome Road is planned right atop some previously staked placer claims that are slated for work.

As can be imagined strong opinions are being expressed on both the subdivision and the mining sides of the issue.

The current debate can be seen in the letters to the Yukon Environmental and Socio-Economic Assessment Board regarding the Slinky claims, which are the claims that are on the Dome Road.

They letters are available for viewing on the internet at www.yesab.ca.

A solution for Whitehorse to avoid this sort of issue is to request from the Yukon government an immediate temporary moratorium on all staking within city limits.

This will permit the other recommendations from the Official Community Plan to be worked out.

Let the Whitehorse community decide where the parks, trails, houses and green spaces should go without the risk of having the very land being staked from underneath it.

Once all the designated land uses have been assigned then portions of the city could be opened up for staking, should the citizens desire it.

Current valid claims would not be affected. All the rights and obligations associated with these claims would still be in force.

What is happening now is backwards.

Staking can still be permitted while land use designations have yet to be planned.

It should be the other way round.

Land use designations must be sorted out before staking can be permitted.

Getting a temporary staking moratorium is not that difficult.

All it takes is an order-in-council from the Yukon Government.

This is what happened in the Peel Watershed.

That large remote ecosystem is deserving of proper land-use planning without the pressures of free-entry staking.

The ecosystem that is even closer to the 24,000 residents of Whitehorse is deserving of the same.

The city should ask the Yukon government for a temporary staking moratorium with Whitehorse until the new Official Community Plan is finalized.

Comments on the 2010 Official Community Plan will be accepted until March 8th.

More information can be found at www.whitehorse.ca.

Lewis Rifkind is a Whitehorse based part-time environmentalist.

Just Posted

Yukon Liquor Corporation delays plans to hike booze prices

After business owners raised concerns the corporation says it will go back and consult on changes

Yukon chooses Dempster fibre line route

“We needed this last piece”

RRDC to require non-Kaska hunters in Ross River area to get special permit

People hoping to hunt in Ross River area this season need a permit from the Ross River Dena Council

New routes top priority for Whitehorse transit plan

Full Sunday service still off the table, though plan proposes pilot project

City mulls replacing Handy Bus with taxi vouchers

‘Whitehorse Transit must take steps to provide a sustainable solution’

Missing Oregon family found after possibly getting lost on purpose

Officials say family of four was found near Dease Lake after their vehicle was apparently abandoned

Yukon Roller Girls, North Coast Nightmares face off at Scar Wars

‘Our jammers had to work a little bit harder than they’re used to’

Big Cruise doubles down on the Skagway cruise market

The world’s largest leisure travel company is doubling down on the Skagway… Continue reading

Neighbours slam proposed Copper Ridge townhouses

Property values, parking cited as cause for concern

New Wolf Creek accessible trail nears completion

‘It’s a totally different trail and they barely touched anything’

Competition topples Tippy Mah’s Whitehorse condo plans

Work suspended on 44-unit project after pre-sales fall short

One-day event focuses on Yukon housing woes

Territory suffers from low vacancy rate, aging rental stock

Mosquito Enduro-X kickstarts racing season

‘It’s fun, family-type racing and it gets the kids out and riding’

Most Read