Reviewing Whitehorse’s arts policy does not spell cultural doom

Anxiety appears to dominate on all sides of the Whitehorse City Council debate over arts funding.

Anxiety appears to dominate on all sides of the Whitehorse City Council debate over arts funding.

First, there’s the intimation from some quarters on the right that diverting one per cent of the cost of capital projects to public art installations amounts to reckless profligacy.

It is true that $367,000 is no small sum, and that councillors have an obligation to closely scrutinize city spending. But such an amount on a $47-million project should not cause concern. (Eagle-eyed readers will notice that $367,000 is less than one per cent of $47 million. That’s because the one per cent rule applies only to the cost of the building itself, not to associated costs like landscaping and furniture.)

But building delays and construction cost overruns are a far graver threat to the sanctity of the public purse than diverting a few hundred thousand dollars from an annual capital budget of $30 million. And it’s worth noting that the city’s arts policy itself says “a minimum” of one per cent of building costs should go towards public art. Council could easily choose to spend more.

Arts advocates who say it’s worthwhile to invest tax money into public art are right: it supports our arts community, draws tourists and helps liven up a downtown core that — beautiful as its natural surroundings might be — is dominated in far too many places by lifeless metal-clad buildings and dull-as-dirt architecture.

Unfortunately, many of these same arts advocates have overreached in criticizing council’s decision to review the city’s arts policy. Council voted 4-3 this week to open up the policy for review, a process which should get underway in early September.

A representative of the Yukon Arts Centre told council she was worried about a review because doing so would have “the potential of allowing the policy to be altered in a way that would negatively impact Whitehorse.”

Coun. Roslyn Woodcock said she worries “if we open this up that we’re going to end up with something we’re not happy with.”

Mayor Dan Curtis has objected to opening up the policy as the city embarks upon its largest-ever capital project.

But that’s life in a democracy. If Curtis, Woodcock and arts advocates are so confident that they’re right, that the one per cent rule ought to be maintained (which it should), they should not fear debate.

Trying to avoid a specific policy discussion because you don’t like the possible outcome is no way for elected officials in a democracy to behave.

It’s also worth noting that nobody on council has called for the arts fund to be cut, though Coun. Dan Boyd has mentioned in passing Calgary’s eminently reasonable policy of devoting one per cent of a project’s first $50 million to public art, then an additional 0.5 per cent after that. (For the record, if any of council’s budget hawks do indeed harbour secret ambitions to start slashing art spending, they owe it to the public, and their council colleagues, to say so at once.)

If the policy is unclear about what constitutes a public building for the purpose of arts funding — no one’s exactly sure if the policy requires the $367,000 to be spent on site, or if the resulting artwork can be placed elsewhere around the city — then that is a problem council needs to fix.

Reviewing the policy so that it’s clear about how much money goes to public art, and where that art can be installed, is not some kind of slippery slope that will end up rendering Whitehorse a cultural wasteland. It’s a basic responsibility of government.

Over the long term, ensuring the city’s arts funding policy is both generous and clear will offer peace of mind to artists and fiscal hawks alike.

Contact Chris Windeyer at

Get local stories you won't find anywhere else right to your inbox.
Sign up here

Just Posted

From Whitehorse to the Whitecaps

Joe Hanson is starting his second season with the Vancouver Whitecaps academy

Mount Lorne Mis-Adventure Trail Race doesn’t miss a step

Blue skies and sunshine for a chilly fall race

Canada Summer Games postponed

Yukon Canada Summer Games athletes will now work on mastering skills in preperation for 2022

Site selection for battery project draws ire of nearby landowners

Yukon Energy is accepting public comments on three possible sites for the project

Taking a closer look at the cosmos

Star gazing party scheduled for Sept. 18

Yukon government releases new guidelines for COVID-19 symptoms and sending children to school

The advice sorts symptoms into three categories: red, yellow and green

Nominations closed in Watson Lake byelection

Four candidates are running for mayor

Baggage screening changes begin

Passengers are asked to arrive earlier than normal in order to accommodate the new temporary system

Yukon Government extends education review

The final report is scheduled for release in March 2021

City hall, briefly

A look at decisions made by Whitehorse city council this week

Lawsuit against Freedom Trails settled

The suit was dismissed with consent of all parties

Tank farm takes another step towards development

OCP designation passes second reading

Climate change strategy targets 30 per cent reduction in territory greenhouse gases by 2030

The strategy includes rebates for electric vehicles but puts off mining targets for two years

Most Read