Supreme Court’s Peel decision is straight to the point

Ruling is an important, precedent-setting decision that defines the scope of land use planning

Kyle Carruthers | Pointed Views

The Supreme Court of Canada’s decision on land use planning in the Peel region was short in comparison to some of the lengthy tracts we were forced to digest in law school. But what it lacked in length — weighing in at just 39 pages in PDF format — it made up for in density of legal substance. Written by Justice Andromache Karakatsanis for a unanimous court, I was impressed by its pith and clarity.

I support the protection of the Peel, so I am pleased by the outcome.

But I must confess I’m surprised by the result. Given the relative newness of the final agreements, the lack of clarity about the government’s role in the land use planning process, and the ostensibly broad authority of Yukon to “accept, reject or modify” a proposed land use plan I expected that the government would get another kick at the can like it did at the Court of Appeal.

I was caught off guard by how far our country’s highest court went in its decision. It was as if the court wanted to put to bed some issues surrounding the interpretation of the final agreements which, while not directly at issue in the lower court rulings, would inevitably arise in the future. In particular, I was struck by the constraints the court put on the ability of the government to modify a land use planning decision.

As those who have followed the case know, the meaning of the word “modify” has important implications for the land use planning process. If its scope is broad, Yukon is very much in the driver’s seat and — provided it follows the process properly — can create whatever plan it desires. If the meaning of modify is narrow, the commission has much more clout and the government’s only option is to reject the proposal in its entirety.

The judges and justices of the Yukon Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal had all declined to limit the term’s scope — focusing instead on the government’s failure to show its cards at the earlier stage of the process as the basis for rejecting its imposed plan.

All levels of court had found that the government breached the process. The more important question all along was what the repercussions of that breach would be. The Supreme Court of Canada’s decision is more in line with that of the Yukon Supreme Court than the Court of Appeal but it went significantly further in terms of protecting the authority of land use planning commissions and limiting that of the government.

Justice Karakatsanis wrote of how the co-management of traditional territory was a compromise the First Nations received when they signed final agreements in exchange for scaled-back land claims. She borrowed from the Oxford English Dictionary which defines the term “modify” as “to make partial or minor changes to … to vary without radical transformation” and a French dictionary which defines the word as “to change (a thing) without altering its nature, its essence.”

These conclusions put to rest the oft-stated position of the former Pasloski government that land use planning was the prerogative of “public government” in the territory and its implied position that the land use planning commission effectively played an advisory role. If modifications are to be partial and minor, and they cannot not alter the essence of a proposed plan, the role of the commission is very much enhanced.

Now that the Supreme Court has had the final word on the subject it appears that the only recourse available to a government displeased with a proposed plan will be to reject it in its entirety. Choosing to appeal the original Yukon Supreme Court decision will go down as a very poor decision.

I wrote previously that I did not expect the Peel decision to become a significant precedent because no future government would make the same error as the previous Yukon Party government by proposing vague, general changes and waiting in the weeds with a substantially different plan at the last moment. Those are words I think I must now take back. First Nation of Nacho Nyak Dun v. Yukon is an important, precedent-setting decision that defines the scope of land use planning for the future.

Part of me wonders if the top court felt an urge to rehabilitate its reputation as an important institutional safeguard for Indigenous rights after a recent decision permitting the development of a large ski resort in an area regarded as sacred by the local Ktunaxa Nation over their objections. It was a decision generally seen as a blow to First Nations lands rights and by some as an insult to Indigenous spiritual beliefs and the imposition of westernized standards of religious freedoms.

But whatever the court’s reasons for writing such a far-reaching judgment, we have unexpected guidance about the land use planning process.

Kyle Carruthers is a born-and-raised Yukoner who lives and practises law in Whitehorse.

Peel watershedYukon politics

Get local stories you won't find anywhere else right to your inbox.
Sign up here

Just Posted

Yukonomist Keith Halliday
Yukonomist: Are they coming?

One of COVID-19’s big economic questions is whether it will prompt a… Continue reading

Yukon MP Larry Bagnell, along with Yukon health and education delegates, announce a new medical research initiative via a Zoom conference on Jan. 21. (Screen shot)
New medical research unit at Yukon University launched

The SPOR SUPPORT Unit will implement patient-first research practices

Yukon First Nation Education Directorate members Bill Bennett, community engagement coordinator and Mobile Therapeutic Unit team lead, left, and Katherine Alexander, director of policy and analytics, speak to the News about the Mobile Therapeutic Unit that will provide education and health support to students in the communities. (yfned.ca)
Mobile Therapeutic Unit will bring education, health support to Indigenous rural students

The mobile unit will begin travelling to communities in the coming weeks

Premier Sandy Silver, left, and Chief Medical Officer of Health Dr. Brendan Hanley, speak during a live stream in Whitehorse on January 20, about the new swish and gargle COVID-19 tests. (Crystal Schick/Yukon News)
Swish and spit COVID-19 test now available in Yukon

Vaccination efforts continue in Whitehorse and smaller communities in the territory

The Royal Canadian Mounted Police detachment in Faro photgraphed in 2016. Faro will receive a new RCMP detachment in 2022, replacing the decades-old building currently accommodating officers. (Joel Krahn/Yukon News file)
Faro RCMP tagged for new detachment

Faro will receive a new RCMP detachment in 2022, replacing the decades-old… Continue reading

In a Jan. 18 announcement, the Yukon government said the shingles vaccine is now being publicly funded for Yukoners between age 65 and 70, while the HPV vaccine program has been expanded to all Yukoners up to and including age 26. (1213rf.com)
Changes made to shingles, HPV vaccine programs

Pharmacists in the Yukon can now provide the shingles vaccine and the… Continue reading

Parking attendant Const. Ouellet puts a parking ticket on the windshield of a vehicle in downtown Whitehorse on Dec. 6, 2018. The City of Whitehorse is hoping to write of nearly $300,000 in outstanding fees, bylaw fines and court fees, $20,225 of which is attributed to parking fines issued to non-Yukon license plates. (Crystal Schick/Yukon News file)
City of Whitehorse could write off nearly $300,000

The City of Whitehorse could write off $294,345 in outstanding fees, bylaw… Continue reading

Grants available to address gender-based violence

Organizations could receive up to $200,000

In this illustration, artist-journalist Charles Fripp reveals the human side of tragedy on the Stikine trail to the Klondike in 1898. A man chases his partner around the tent with an axe, while a third man follows, attempting to intervene. (The Daily Graphic/July 27, 1898)
History Hunter: Charles Fripp — gold rush artist

The Alaskan coastal town of Wrangell was ill-equipped for the tide of… Continue reading

A man walks passed the polling place sign at city hall in Whitehorse on Oct. 18, 2018. While Whitehorse Mayor Dan Curtis is now setting his sights on the upcoming territorial election, other members of council are still pondering their election plans for the coming year. (Crystal Schick/Yukon News file)
Councillors undecided on election plans

Municipal vote set for Oct. 21

Whitehorse City Hall. (Joel Krahn/Yukon News file)
City hall, briefly

A look at decicions made by Whitehorse city council this week.

A file photo of grizzly bear along the highway outside Dawson City. Yukon conservation officers euthanized a grizzly bear Jan. 15 that was originally sighted near Braeburn. (Alistair Maitland/Yukon News file)
Male grizzly euthanized near Braeburn

Yukon conservation officers have euthanized a grizzly bear that was originally sighted… Continue reading

Most Read