Yukon Supreme Court Chief Justice Suzanne Duncan dismissed an application on May 3 seeking more transparity on the territory’s state of emergency declaration. (Joel Krahn/Yukon News file)

Yukon Supreme Court Chief Justice Suzanne Duncan dismissed an application on May 3 seeking more transparity on the territory’s state of emergency declaration. (Joel Krahn/Yukon News file)

Supreme Court rules confidential memo can’t be used in challenge of state of emergency

Court upholds cabinet confidentiality after request to use internal government memo as evidence.

Legal proceedings launched last year by a group of individuals seeking an end to the Yukon’s state of emergency have hit a setback following a May 3 Yukon Supreme Court decision.

Chief Justice Suzanne Duncan dismissed an application from the original seven litigants seeking an order for the Yukon commissioner and cabinet to produce a memorandum they consulted before deciding to extend the state of emergency on June 12, 2020. The decision was made by the commissioner and cabinet, as the legislature was not sitting at the time.

The initial petition was launched last June by a group of seven individuals, six from the Yukon and one from Atlin, British Columbia: Ross Mercer, Trent Andrew Jamieson, Douglas Craig Walker, Allan Patrick Mytrash, Martin Gregory Loos, Jan Erik Martensson and Clayton Robert Thomas.

The petition was filed to challenge the Yukon government’s response to the pandemic. It sought an order declaring that the Civil Emergency Measures Act, under which the government had declared the state of emergency, is “inconsistent with the unwritten constitutional principles of Canada.”

It also called for declarations that measures including border controls, self-isolation requirements, gathering limits and rules for businesses violated various sections of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

The latest phase of the legal action is a request that the memorandum be released so it can be used as evidence in the original suit.

Cabinet discussions

Responding to the application, the government told the court they relied on a memorandum to the Executive Council dated June 9, 2020, in making their decision to extend the state of emergency. They objected to producing the memorandum on the basis of public interest immunity, a legal doctrine that authorizes the non-disclosure of information on the basis that the disclosure is against the public interest.

Justice Duncan’s decision states that a determination of the public interest immunity must balance the public interest in preserving cabinet confidentiality and the public interest in administering justice.

The decision states that the memorandum contained confidential advice and a recommendation regarding the emergency extension. It was issued by the Minister of Community Services to the other ministers of the cabinet.

Duncan’s analysis of the lawsuit, presented along with her decision, notes that it is a matter of constitutional convention that cabinet deliberations are confidential in order to allow for free discussion and deliberation without fear of political repercussions. Drawing on a precedent-setting case from Ontario, Duncan’s decision notes that this confidentiality is extended to cabinet documents.

The analysis notes that courts have ruled that cabinet confidentiality is not absolute.

Lawyers responding to the suit on behalf of the government said the court can only strike down an order in council if it was made for an improper or irrelevant purpose. They said that the petitioners must show that there was no evidence for cabinet’s opinion that the pandemic continued to be an emergency in June 2020.

They go on to argue that there was publicly available information supporting cabinet’s opinion to the extent necessary for the court to review its decision.

“It is important to note that the petitioners are not claiming that the government acted unconscionably or in bad faith, or engaged in wrongdoing. If this were the case, the public interest in disclosure might very well outweigh the public interest in cabinet confidentiality, because there might be an argument that the document is being used to shield bad behaviour. This is not relevant here,” the decision reads.

In a statement included with the judgement, Stephen Mills, deputy minister of the executive council office and cabinet secretary, said that disclosure of the document will negatively affect the completeness and candour of advice and submissions to cabinet related to its ongoing decision-making and planning around the COVID-19 pandemic.

The petitioners say the argument presented in Mills’ affidavit is not sufficient.

Pandemic is ongoing

Duncan writes that the high level of government decision-making and the severity of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic at the time of her decision are also factors in keeping the memorandum confidential. If the pandemic were over, Duncan stated the timing of the release might weigh less heavily on her decision.

The decision also notes that the information presented to cabinet in June 2020 may be out of date and its release could create or encourage ill-informed or petty political criticism.

The petitioners argue that access to the memorandum is necessary for the administration of justice in their suit. They argue that the extension of the state of emergency through an order in council was an improper shifting of power from the legislature to the executive. Duncan’s judgement notes that the legislature passed a motion in support of the state of emergency in November 2020 and then voted to extend the state of emergency the following month. Duncan writes that the support from the legislature diminishes the argument that there was an improper shift of power.

The judgement states that the petitioners will be able to argue that the commissioner and cabinet’s decision was egregious without access to the confidential memo. Duncan goes on to write that significant public information on the state of the pandemic in June 2020 is out there for them to make arguments about the extension of the state of emergency’s inconsistency with statute or unwritten constitutional principles or to argue cabinet’s possible failure to justify the decision.

Duncan wrote that she did not feel the need to view the memorandum herself and that it is clear in her view that public interest immunity applies for reasons which have much more to do with the context rather than the content of the document itself.

Contact Jim Elliot at jim.elliot@yukon-news.com


Just Posted

Main Street in Whitehorse on May 4. Whitehorse city council has passed a bylaw to allow pop-up patios in city parking spaces. (Stephanie Waddell/Yukon News)
Bagged meter fees could be discounted for patios

Council passes first reading at special meeting

The Kwanlin Dün First Nation’s business park planned in Marwell is among a number of sites that are expected to make more commercial/industrial land available in the coming years. (Submitted)
Council hears update on commercial land

Number of developments expected to make land available in near future

keith halliday
Yukonomist: Have I got an opportunity for you!

Are you tired of the same-old, same-old at work? Would you like to be a captain of industry, surveying your domain from your helicopter and enjoying steak dinners with influential government officials at the high-profile Roundup mining conference?

Clouds pass by the Supreme Court of Canada in Ottawa, Friday, June 12, 2020. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld
Yukon government, B.C. company want Supreme Court of Canada appeal of Wolverine Mine case

Government concerned with recouping cleanup costs, creditor wants review of receiver’s actions.

John Hopkins-Hill/Yukon News file
Catherine Elliott, Yukon acting Chief Medical Officer of Health, has announced two new COVID-19 cases in the Yukon.
Two new COVID-19 cases confirmed, Porter Creek Secondary prom cancelled

Graduating students are encouraged to self-isolate and monitor for symptoms

The Village of Carmacks has received federal funding for an updated asset management plan. (Crystal Schick/Yukon News file)
Federal funding coming to Carmacks

The program is aimed at helping municipalities improve planning and decision-making around infrastructure

Paddlers start their 715 kilometre paddling journey from Rotary Park in Whitehorse on June 26, 2019. The 2021 Yukon River Quest will have a different look. (Crystal Schick/Yukon News file)
The 22nd annual Yukon River Quest moves closer to start date

Although the race will be modified in 2021, a field of 48 teams are prepared to take the 715 kilometre journey from Whitehorse to Dawson City on the Yukon River

Whitehorse City Hall (Yukon News file)
City news, briefly

A look at issues discussed by Whitehorse city council at its June 7 meeting

The RCMP Critical Incident Program will be training in Watson Lake from June 14-16. Mike Thomas/Yukon News
RCMP will conduct three days of training in Watson Lake

Lakeview Apartment in Watson Lake will be used for RCMP training

John Tonin/Yukon News Squash players duke it out during Yukon Open tournament action at Better Bodies on June 5.
Four division titles earned at squash Yukon Open

The territory’s squash talent was on full display at the 2021 Yukon Open

Runners leave the start line of the 2014 Klondike Trail of ‘98 International Road Relay Skagway. The 2021 race will start at checkpoint six and remain in the Yukon only. (Tom Patrick/Yukon News)
Klondike Road Relay returns to in-person after a virtual year

A modified, in-person Klondike Road Relay will be open to Yukoners

John Tonin/Yukon News Rang Pillai speaks at the Great Yukon Summer press conference on May 27.
‘The sooner the better’: Operators react to Great Yukon Summer campaign

The Great Yukon Summer campaign was announced May 27 and begins June 4

Most Read