Ross River’s land claim case heads back to court

The Court of Appeal for Yukon is sending a land claim dispute between the Ross River Dena Council and the federal government back to the Yukon Supreme Court for another trial.

The Court of Appeal for Yukon is sending a land claim dispute between the Ross River Dena Council and the federal government back to the Yukon Supreme Court for another trial.

The three-judge appeal panel ruled that Yukon Supreme Court Justice Leigh Gower erred when he tried to interpret what the government of Canada’s legislators were thinking when they signed an 1870 order that brought the land that would become the Yukon into Confederation.

In that order, the government promised to compensate the “Indian tribes” for “lands required for purposes of settlement.”

Ross River is one of three Yukon First Nations that have yet to sign a land claim, self-government or final agreement with Canada.

Negotiations got underway in 1996 and continued until June 2002, when the mandate for the Canadian government expired.

The First Nation rejected the government’s formal offer to settle the land claim. There have been no negotiations since.

The Ross Rover Dena Council brought suit against the federal government in 2005, arguing that the government had failed in its constitutional duty to settle land claims and provide compensation before land was opened up for settlement in its traditional territories.

During a two-week-long court case in November 2012, lawyers for Canada brought in Cambridge University Professor Paul McHugh who testified that the 1870 agreement should be read in the context of the time it was written.

They argued that Gower had to decide what the government of Canada was thinking when they signed the contract in 1870.

He sided with Ottawa.

“Accordingly, I agree with Canada that the relevant provision in the 1870 order cannot create an obligation to negotiate treaties and that Canada retains the discretion to decide if, when, and how to negotiate, as a matter of Crown prerogative,” wrote Gower in his original decision.

But the Appeal Court rejected that reasoning, calling it an example of “originalism,” or “the idea that the intentions of the drafters of constitutional documents forever govern their interpretation.”

“It is particularly dangerous to assume that a matter that was not intended to be the subject of adjudication by the courts in 1870 remains outside the supervision of the courts today,” wrote Justice Harvey Groberman. “The role of the courts in constitutional adjudication was completely unascertained at that time. Further, the Crown enjoyed near-complete immunity from judicial oversight in its fulfillment of obligations.”

In other words, although the government could not have been challenged in court in 1870, that is no longer the case.

Groberman noted that the case could “affect title to and rights over vast tracts of land in Yukon” and that “it was not appropriate to hive off the issue of the historical intentions of Parliament and of the British government leading up to the 1870 order.”

Contact Josh Kerr at

joshk@yukon-news.com

Just Posted

Yukon government announces review on inclusive and special education in the territory

Review, led by a B.C. educator, stems from 2019 auditor general report on Yukon’s education system

Zoning approved for seniors housing development

Roddick lone councillor to vote against third reading

WYATT’S WORLD

Wyatt’s World

YG announces money for 12 affordable housing projects

Successful applicants include Energy North and Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation

More Yukon Quest mushers reach finish in Whitehorse

Swedish musher Nora Sjalin is this year’s Rookie of the Year Award winner

History Hunter: Will Rogers and Wiley Post: Their historic visit to the Yukon

The story of the American pilot and the film star has a Yukon connection

EDITORIAL: What would happen if Whitehorse transit was free?

If the city is considering cheaper fares we might as well crunch the numbers on no fares at all

City news, briefly

Some of the decisions made at Whitehorse city council’s meeting on Feb. 10

Most Read