Tough questions about land claims should be welcomed, not condemned

Yule Schmidt It was with interest that I read Liberal Leader Sandy Silver's comments on the opinion piece about land claims which I wrote for the National Post on Feb. 25. Normally I do not respond to comments on my articles. My intent in writing is to

by Yule Schmidt

It was with interest that I read Liberal Leader Sandy Silver’s comments on the opinion piece about land claims which I wrote for the National Post on Feb. 25.

Normally I do not respond to comments on my articles. My intent in writing is to advance debate, not to push my own views as the right ones. As such, I welcome informed counter-arguments, for as the discussion moves back and forth it also moves forward.

But I do not welcome poorly veiled attempts to snag political points at the expense of such debate.

I am mildly offended that Mr. Silver decided to address his rebuttal to the government as opposed to me. Perhaps it was a decision borne of misplaced chivalry, namely the hesitation to insult a lady. Or perhaps it was borne of untimely chauvinism, namely the disbelief that a lady such as myself could conjure up such opinions on her own.

Yet on either count, I assure Mr. Silver that I possess the mental acuity to not only generate but to defend my own opinions.

Perhaps it surprises the Liberal leader that I was able to freely express my thoughts without having them politically vetted, but last time I checked, that chunk of the Constitution that protects freedom of speech had not been deleted.

In fact, rather than be troubled by it, I should think Mr. Silver and others in the opposition would find it comforting to know that a political staffer retains the independence to publish articles as I did. Is that not something we should commend as a society?

If it is not common practice, it is not because it is “denied” by the government, but because of reactions such as Mr. Silver’s: if by sharing my thoughts, the best I can expect in terms of debate is the opportunistic conflation of my opinion with my position, then what’s the point?

As for the content of my article, Mr. Silver either did not read it or did not understand it. I pointed out a historical discrepancy between the initial, stated goal of land claims – certainty – and the current reality of uncertainty with respect to their interpretation.

I pinpointed a significant jump in this uncertainty resulting from the precedent-setting court cases which confirmed that the “honour of the Crown” supersedes the letter of the claims, even on issues which the agreements purported to “settle.” While we take it for granted today, it was not inherent from the beginning that the honour of the Crown would trump the letter of land claims. After all, the Little Salmon court case was launched to ask just that question.

In an interview last week, the renowned aboriginal affairs expert Ken Coates essentially said the same thing: “every paragraph [of the land claims] is contestable,” and prophesized that the Yukon government and First Nations would continue to dispute land claims in court. It’s rather ironic that the Aboriginal Affairs website itself celebrates that comprehensive agreements “provide aboriginal groups with an alternative to going to court to resolve their claims.”

The article was thus primarily an articulation of facts. The only real “opinion” in it was that the first-among-equals status that the honour of the Crown bestows upon First Nations is neither necessary nor desirable in a relationship of equals.

First Nations have proven that they do not need government (or opposition) paternalism, yet paternalism – misguidedly called a “fiduciary obligation” to First Nations – is what the honour of the Crown inherently promotes.

It goes without saying that dealings with First Nations, as with all citizens, should be conducted with integrity, but achieving that should not require special legal provisions. Isn’t it troubling to think that it does?

We should not shy away from debating these kinds of questions, as politically charged as they may be; it is precisely what we should be doing with our time (and our newspaper space). I chose to write on the topic of land claims disputes because it is an important issue facing Yukon, the resolution of which is vital to our social and economic development.

Were there sides of the debate which I did not address? Of course. The issues we face as a territory, much less as a civilization, are far too complex to be distilled into a 700 word article.

But the value of such an article is in triggering more such articles, written from different perspectives on different aspects of the issue. That is how debate advances. That is how society advances.

I would have been glad to see Mr. Silver join the debate by producing a contradictory opinion, but I have yet to hear one from him. Simply decrying a viewpoint without offering an alternative does not qualify as debate. It is an immature tactic that has no place in a politician’s playbook and is certainly not worthy of Yukoners.

Debate is a good thing. It would serve Mr. Silver well to demonstrate he is capable of it.

Yule Schmidt is based in Whitehorse, where she serves as a special advisor to the Yukon government. This article reflects her personal views and not those of her employer.

Get local stories you won't find anywhere else right to your inbox.
Sign up here

Just Posted

The Many Rivers Counselling and Support Services building in Whitehorse on March 28, 2019. Three people who sat on Many Rivers’ board immediately before it closed for good say they were relieved to hear that the Yukon RCMP has undertaken a forensic audit into the now-defunct NGO’s financial affairs. (Crystal Schick/Yukon News file)
Former Many Rivers board members relieved to hear about forensic audit, wonder what took so long

Three people who sat on Many Rivers’ board immediately before it closed… Continue reading

Whitehorse General Hospital in Whitehorse on Feb. 14, 2019. The Yukon Employees’ Union and Yukon Hospital Corporation are at odds over whether there’s a critical staffing shortage at the territory’s hospitals. (Crystal Schick/Yukon News file)
YEU, Yukon Hospital Corp. at odds over whether hospitals are understaffed

YEU says four nurses quit within 12 hours last week, a claim the YHC says is “inaccurate”

Two former Whitehorse Correctional Centre inmates, Ray Hartling and Mark Lange, have filed a class action against the jail, corrections officials and Yukon government on behalf of everyone who’s been placed in two restrictive units over the past six years. (Joel Krahn/Yukon News file)
Class action filed against Whitehorse Correctional Centre over use of segregation

Two former Whitehorse Correctional Centre inmates have filed a class action against… Continue reading


Wyatt’s World for Oct. 21, 2020

Movie poster for <em>Ìfé,</em> a movie being shown during OUT North Film Festival, which includes approximately 20 different films accessible online this year. (Submitted)
OUT North Film Festival moves to virtual format

In its ninth year, the artistic director said this year has a more diverse set of short and feature films

Triple J’s Canna Space in Whitehorse on April 17, 2019, opens their first container of product. Two years after Canada legalized the sale of cannabis, Yukon leads the country in per capita legal sales. (Crystal Schick/Yukon News file)
Yukon leads Canadian cannabis sales two years after legalization

Private retailers still asking for changes that would allow online sales

A sign greets guests near the entrance of the Canada Games Centre in Whitehorse on June 11. The city announced Oct. 16 it was moving into the next part of its phased reopening plan with spectator seating areas open at a reduced capacity to allow for physical distancing. (Crystal Schick/Yukon News file)
CGC reopening continues

Limited spectator seating now available

During Whitehorse city council’s Oct. 19 meeting, planning manager Mélodie Simard brought forward a recommendation that a proposed Official Community Plan amendment move forward that would designate a 56.3 hectare piece of land in Whistle Bend, currently designated as green space, as urban residential use. (Courtesy City of Whitehorse)
More development in Whistle Bend contemplated

OCP change would be the first of several steps to develop future area

EDITORIAL: Don’t let the City of Whitehorse distract you

A little over two weeks after Whitehorse city council voted to give… Continue reading

Whitehorse City Hall. (Joel Krahn/Yukon News file)
City hall, briefly

A look at decisions made by Whitehorse city council this week

Northwestel has released the proposed prices for its unlimited plans. Unlimited internet in Whitehorse and Carcross could cost users between $160.95 and $249.95 per month depending on their choice of package. (Yukon News file)
Unlimited internet options outlined

Will require CRTC approval before Northwestel makes them available

Legislative assembly on the last day of the fall sitting in Whitehorse. Yukon’s territorial government will sit for 45 days this sitting instead of 30 days to make up for lost time caused by COVID-19 in the spring. (Crystal Schick/Yukon News file)
Legislative assembly sitting extended

Yukon’s territorial government will sit for 45 days this sitting. The extension… Continue reading

Today’s mailbox: Mad about MAD

Letters to the editor published Oct. 16, 2020

Most Read