iPhone 3G, meet the cellphone cartel

Okay, just to be clear, this isn’t yet-another-iPhone-3G review. I’ve read enough of those over the past two weeks; I think I’d…

Okay, just to be clear, this isn’t yet-another-iPhone-3G review.

I’ve read enough of those over the past two weeks; I think I’d puke if I even saw another one.

Most reviews have been glowing, some embarrassingly so. And, yes, the iPhone is great — the best smartphone to date, in fact — but it still carries some significant flaws.

The primary one among them, in fact, has nothing to do with the iPhone itself.

Instead, it’s the network.

(Or the lack thereof, in my case as a Whitehorse resident.)

As with any mobile phone, to buy an iPhone you’ve got to lock yourself in with a particular mobile service provider in a particular country for a long period of time.

So to buy an iPhone, I had to sign a 36-month agreement with Rogers promising to pay them about $60 a month for the privilege of using my new device on their network.

(Wow. Even to write that makes me shake my head. What was I thinking?)

And that just covers me for one locale: Vancouver. If I go anywhere else, it’s gonna cost me more, and dearly so. Mobile long distance rates in Canada are brutal.

And if I dare to roam southward over the border, I’d best prepare to mortgage my soul.

The whole idea of a mobile phone is just that: to be mobile.

The unfortunate irony is, however, that true mobility carries a significant and relatively uncertain price tag.

It doesn’t have to be this way, though.

Most mobile telephone networks are digital, which means they transfer nothing more than bytes. That’s the same stuff you send when you use e-mail or the web on a computer.

Mobile telephone networks today don’t carry voice signals; they carry a representation of the sounds you make in digital form.

In the days of yore, when telephone networks were analogue, “voice” as a commodity was an accurate representation of the service.

But that’s from a time when Culture Club was on the charts.

Nowadays, we’re paying too much to be beholden to that ancient paradigm.

Voice, pictures, video, text messages — it’s all the same.

Telephone companies offer complicated calling plans for no reason other than to obfuscate of this fact.

They want to confuse you and me in an effort to produce a veneer of value for the “services” they provide, thus pushing us up the rate scale.

Really, it’s all smoke and mirrors. At the end of the day, they’re just selling us raw data wrapped up in some marketing gibberish.

So it’s unfortunate that, along with a groundbreaking mobile device, Apple wasn’t ballsy enough to force groundbreaking network access.

Apple should have formed what’s known as an MVNO, or Mobile Virtual Network Operator. As an MVNO, Apple could have provided network access transparently to iPhone users without openly involving Rogers, AT&T or any other recognized brand.

Instead, it would have bulk-bought access to mobile data networks and resold the traffic to iPhone users as an Apple service.

That’s what Virgin does, and even Walt Disney has operated an MVNO service.

As an MVNO, Apple could have done away with the complex locale-based service regime of traditional mobile phone companies and replaced it with what the iPhone is really all about: mobile data.

Apple’s MVNO wouldn’t sell voice or text services. They’d sell access to a data network.

You’d still be able to make and answer calls, and engage in text messaging. How you use the iPhone wouldn’t change.

Just how the value of the service translates into cost would be changed.

Long distance calls would be non-existent, because “where” wouldn’t be relevant.

Text messages would be rendered free, or replaced by instant messaging. And, no matter where you got off the plane, your iPhone would work (unless, of course, you landed in Whitehorse).

Apple’s MVNO would replace the complex, service-oriented rate plans of the traditional mobile phone companies with simple data plans.

Those plans would generally be flat rate, with additional fees for going over in data volume.

(Wow, that sort of sounds like how we get billed for land-based internet. Go figure.)

Of course, Apple doesn’t have to be the first purely data-based MVNO on the scene. Any company could do this.

But the combination of the popular iPhone and its software perfectly position Apple to play that role.

This is because the iPhone operating system is derived from Apple’s Mac OS X operating system.

And one of the coolest features in Mac OS X is its native voice, text, and video communication client, iChat.

I use iChat every day on my Mac to place video and voice calls to people all around the world for no charge at all.

If Apple had formed an MVNO and released an iPhone with iChat capabilities, they would have forever changed the face of mobile telecommunications.

There would be no more need for a mobile voice network.

And that’s probably why Apple didn’t — or couldn’t — form an MVNO.

Not because they didn’t want to, or didn’t see the benefits of such a move.

But because the telecommunications providers recognized that a data-only iPhone was the first step in the dismantling of an industry that is, arguably, a cartel.

I wouldn’t be surprised if AT&T has refused to lease their networks to an Apple MVNO, sensing the threat of a data-oriented iPhone.

What’s more, I’d posit that AT&T actively banned iChat from the iPhone as a clause in a contract before they even let the iPhone on their network in the first place.

Because there’s really no technical reason for iChat to be missing from this device.

The absence of iChat on the iPhone is really quite tragic from a consumer perspective. In fact, it’s borderline collusion, assuming AT&T blocked its inclusion.

The iPhone is the killer smartphone that most reviews make it out to be. Unfortunately, the mobile telecommunications cartel prevents it from reaching its true potential as an advanced mobile data device.

Get local stories you won't find anywhere else right to your inbox.
Sign up here

Just Posted

Chief Medical Officer of Health Dr. Brendan Hanley gives a COVID-19 update during a press conference in Whitehorse on May 26. The Yukon government announced two new cases of COVID-19 in the territory with a press release on Oct. 19. (Alistair Maitland Photography)
Two new cases of COVID-19 announced in Yukon

Contact tracing is complete and YG says there is no increased risk to the public

Yukon Energy in Whitehorse on April 8. Yukon Energy faced a potential “critical” fuel shortage in January due to an avalanche blocking a shipping route from Skagway to the Yukon, according to an email obtained by the Yukon Party and questioned in the legislature on Oct. 14. (Crystal Schick/Yukon News file)
Yukon Energy faced ‘critical’ fuel shortage last January due to avalanche

An email obtained by the Yukon Party showed energy officials were concerned

Jeanie McLean (formerly Dendys), the minister responsible for the Women’s Directorate speaks during legislative assembly in Whitehorse on Nov. 27, 2017. “Our government is proud to be supporting Yukon’s grassroots organizations and First Nation governments in this critical work,” said McLean of the $175,000 from the Yukon government awarded to four community-based projects aimed at preventing violence against Indigenous women. (Crystal Schick/Yukon News file)
Yukon government gives $175k to projects aimed at preventing violence against Indigenous women

Four projects were supported via the Prevention of Violence against Aboriginal Women Fund

Yukonomist Keith Halliday
Yukonomist: You don’t know what you’ve got ‘til it’s gone

When I was a kid, CP Air had a monopoly on flights… Continue reading

EDITORIAL: Don’t let the City of Whitehorse distract you

A little over two weeks after Whitehorse city council voted to give… Continue reading

Whitehorse City Hall. (Joel Krahn/Yukon News file)
City hall, briefly

A look at decisions made by Whitehorse city council this week

Northwestel has released the proposed prices for its unlimited plans. Unlimited internet in Whitehorse and Carcross could cost users between $160.95 and $249.95 per month depending on their choice of package. (Yukon News file)
Unlimited internet options outlined

Will require CRTC approval before Northwestel makes them available

Legislative assembly on the last day of the fall sitting in Whitehorse. Yukon’s territorial government will sit for 45 days this sitting instead of 30 days to make up for lost time caused by COVID-19 in the spring. (Crystal Schick/Yukon News file)
Legislative assembly sitting extended

Yukon’s territorial government will sit for 45 days this sitting. The extension… Continue reading

Today’s mailbox: Mad about MAD

Letters to the editor published Oct. 16, 2020

Alkan Air hangar in Whitehorse. Alkan Air has filed its response to a lawsuit over a 2019 plane crash that killed a Vancouver geologist on board, denying that there was any negligence on its part or the pilot’s. (Crystal Schick/Yukon News file)
Alkan Air responds to lawsuit over 2019 crash denying negligence, liability

Airline filed statement of defence Oct. 7 to lawsuit by spouse of geologist killed in crash

Whitehorse city council members voted Oct. 13 to decline an increase to their base salaries that was set to be made on Jan. 1. (Crystal Schick/Yukon News file)
Council declines increased wages for 2021

Members will not have wages adjusted for CPI

A vehicle is seen along Mount Sima Road in Whitehorse on May 12. At its Oct. 13 meeting, Whitehorse city council approved the third reading for two separate bylaws that will allow the land sale and transfer agreements of city-owned land — a 127-square-metre piece next to 75 Ortona Ave. and 1.02 hectares of property behind three lots on Mount Sima Road. (Crystal Schick/Yukon News file)
Whitehorse properties could soon expand

Land sale agreements approved by council

Most Read