Cellphones are shackles at Bell Prison

If you're a Bell customer, the company will make you its prisoner next month when it turns your mobile phone into the equivalent of an ankle bracelet that tracks your every move.

If you’re a Bell customer, the company will make you its prisoner next month when it turns your mobile phone into the equivalent of an ankle bracelet that tracks your every move.

And your contract with Bell will become your prison sentence that indentures you to suffer an nigh-escapable term of information servitude to the company.

Starting November 16, Bell will collect data about where you go, who you phone, what apps you use, what web sites you visit, along with many others details about how, when, and where you use your mobile device.

With this data, Bell will build a detailed, highly personal profile of you that it will use widely within Bell and its affiliate companies – including its retail presence, The Source.

This profile will be unprecedented in its scale and scope. Even Google doesn’t know as much about you as Bell soon will.

Then, periodically, Bell will strip away the personal details and melt a copy of your data down into a pot with similar inmates’. It’ll sell that to advertisers for what will certainly be a tremendous profit.

It’s a lucrative new revenue stream for the company. And, frankly, it’s surprising the company didn’t do it a long time ago. U.S. mobile behemoth Verizon has been at it for a couple of years now.

Other companies track our online exploits too, of course. Facebook and Google spring to mind as two companies that make their livings from it.

But we willingly entered into agreements with those companies, permitting them to track what we do online. We understand that they resell our data for profit because, in exchange, we get free services.

So there shouldn’t be much of a problem with what Bell’s doing. And, truly, there isn’t.

The real issue is the way the company is doing it. Bell’s actions and behaviours are, to put it bluntly, immoral and unethical, if not illegal (our federal privacy commission has launched an investigation into that last question).

Consider that Bell didn’t even ask us if it’s OK to collect, analyze, store and resell the most intimate details of our daily lives.

Instead, the company just took its customers for granted.

I signed a contract with Bell for mobile telecommunications services, period. I’ve never authorized or agreed to expansive personal tracking. No Bell customer ever has.

Activities that involve private information gathering in Canada are governed by federal regulations that generally require an “opt-in” mechanism – a technical way of asking permission. Bell appears to consider itself above such paltry niceties and, instead, it’s just flipping an “on” switch as it flips us the bird.

As a result, Bell has effectively altered the legal and ethical relationship it has with customers, without our consent.

Then there’s an issue of compensation. Make no mistake, Bell’s core motive here is money, and the company should have considered cutting us in on the action.

Google alone made over $3 billion in profit from July to September this year, much of which came from selling information to advertisers.

Bell will introduce tens, if not hundreds, of millions of new dollars into its revenue stream by reselling customer activity data.

But, wait: we actually pay Bell, through our monthly service fees, to collect, manage, and resell that data. We’re basically financing Bell’s new business endeavour, with no promise of any return on our personal information investment.

So Bell should have also offered us a tangible benefit like, say, a steep discount on our bill each month in exchange for making our information available to sell.

Possibly the most heinous aspect of Bell’s approach is the fact that there is no way for us to prevent the company from tracking us and reselling information about us. There is no “opt-out” mechanism. We’re trapped.

Finally, Bell should have shared. I’d love to see any profile Bell builds about me that’s based on how I use my mobile device. I’m sure a lot of people would.

There’s nothing wrong with the basic premise of Bell’s new venture. Collecting and reselling customer data is par for the course these days in terms of a business model.

But Bell has just gone about introducing it as a business practice in the worst way possible. The company disrespected its customers and, in my view, breached our privacy rights and interests by introducing extreme new service terms that took advantage of the fact we’re all trapped in a binding contract.

The company should have invited us to participate by politely requesting our permission. It should have provided us with an opportunity to deliberately “opt-in” to having our mobile activities and behaviours tracked, collected, and resold.

Bell should have offered us a share of the spoils. It’s our information for sale, after all, and we already cover the cost of collecting it.

Most importantly, we should have been allowed to deny Bell access to this information, to maintain our privacy. We should have been allowed to “opt-out” and keep information about ourselves to ourselves.

Finally, Bell should share the information with us that it collects about us. Even credit agencies do that.

Honestly, if Bell had taken this approach I would have willingly signed on. Instead, I’m resigned to the fact that the only way to effectively opt-out of Bell’s egregious new terms is to end my seven-year relationship with the company.

So, yeah, I’m paying my Bell bail early and heading over to Telus where they actually respect your privacy. I’d recommend you consider doing the same if you have the opportunity.

Mea culpa

In my last column I suggested that NorthwesTel hadn’t apologized to its customers for the outage of its internet usage notification tool. In fact, the company had, and so it’s my turn to apologize to NorthwesTel.

The company wrote in an email, “We apologize for the inconvenience.”

When I wrote that the company hadn’t apologized, I was including reference to the customers who had suffered extra monetary penalties as a result of the outage of the tool. I think we all can agree that unexpected sums on a bill qualify as slightly more than an “inconvenience,” so it’s arguable that the company hadn’t fully apologized. But maybe I was splitting hairs. So I’d like to offer a heartfelt apology to NorthwesTel for the, um, inconvenience.

Andrew Robulack is an award-winning entrepreneur, writer and consultant specializing in using technology and the internet to communicate. Read his blog at www.geeklife.ca.

Get local stories you won't find anywhere else right to your inbox.
Sign up here

Just Posted

Commissioner of Yukon Anglique Bernard, in her role as Chancellor of the Order of Yukon, announced the 2020 Order of the Yukon inductees in a statement Dec. 2. (Crystal Schick/Yukon News)
Order of Yukon inductees announced

Ten Yukoners will receive territory’s highest honour

The primary goal of the new relief package for tourism operators is to support the tourism sector, whether they’re private industry or not-for-profit organizations, said Tourism and Culture Minister Jeanie McLean. (Crystal Schick/Yukon News file)
Relief program offers funds for businesses that rely on tourists for more than half their revenue

Two new streams of funding, in addition to the accommodation relief program, were announced

Yukonomist Keith Halliday
YUKONOMIST: Climate emergency, lite edition

Back in September 2019, Whitehorse City Council declared a climate emergency, to… Continue reading

Yukon Employees’ Union says a lack of staff training and high turnover at the Whitehorse Emergency Shelter is creating a dangerous situation for underpaid workers. (Crystal Schick/Yukon News file)
Yukon Employees’ Union says lack of training at emergency shelter leading to unsafe situations

Health and Social Services Minister Pauline Frost said the staffing policy “is evolving”

Justice Karen Wenckebach will begin serving as resident judge on the Yukon Supreme Court early next year. (Crystal Schick/Yukon News)
All-female justice roster ‘a good step’ for diversity in Yukon Supreme Court

Karen Wenckebach is the third woman appointed to the Yukon Supreme Court in history

A sign outside the Yukon Inn Convention Centre indicates Yukoners can get a flu vaccine inside. As of Dec. 4, the vaccinations won’t be available at the convention centre. (Crystal Schick/Yukon News)
Whitehorse Convention Centre ends flu vaccination service early

Flu vaccinations won’t be available at the Whitehorse Convention Centre after Dec.… Continue reading

Today’s mailbox: Kindness, shingles and speed limits

Letters to the editor published Dec. 4, 2020

COMMENTARY: Land use planning must include industry

Carl Schulze Special to the News This commentary is a response to… Continue reading

Whitehorse City Hall. (Joel Krahn/Yukon News file)
City hall, briefly

A look at decisions made by Whitehorse city council this week

Nominations continue to be open for Northern Tutchone members of the White River First Nation to run for councillors in the 2021 election. (Maura Forrest/Yukon News File)
White River First Nation to elect new chief and council

Nominations continue to be open for Northern Tutchone members of the White… Continue reading

The Town of Watson Lake has elected John Devries as a new councillor in a byelection held Dec. 3. (Wikimedia Commons)
Watson Lake elects new councillor

The Town of Watson Lake has elected John Devries as a new… Continue reading

The new Little Salmon Carmacks First Nation council elected Dec. 1. (Submitted)
Little Salmon Carmacks elects new chief, council

Nicole Tom elected chief of Little Salmon Carcmacks First Nation

Submitted/Yukon News file
Yukon RCMP’s Historical Case Unit is seeking information related to the unsolved homicide of Allan Donald Waugh, 69, who was found deceased in his house on May 30, 2014.
Yukon RCMP investigating unsolved Allan Waugh homicide

Yukon RCMP’s Historical Case Unit is seeking information related to an unsolved… Continue reading

Most Read