canadas real welfare rolls

A report released this week by the National Council on Welfare reveals that most Canadians living on social assistance can’t afford decent…

A report released this week by the National Council on Welfare reveals that most Canadians living on social assistance can’t afford decent housing or adequate food. According to council chairman John Rook, “There is nowhere on welfare where it’s decent living.”

Imagine for instance trying to raise a child by yourself in Alberta’s booming — or busting — economy on $13,703 a year, or surviving with a disability on $8,440. Becoming Canada’s richest province hasn’t changed the fact that Alberta has the lowest social assistance rates, but for most Canadians, no matter where, life on welfare means grinding poverty.

The National Council on Welfare is an arm’s-length advisory body to the minister of Human Resources and Social Development. The report measures welfare incomes based on the benchmark of the Low Income Cut-Off, or LICO, the line below which a household’s economy is considered unsustainable. A couple with two children in British Columbia gets only 60 per cent of this amount.

Many working Canadians are less than sympathetic to the plight of welfare recipients. I work for my money, they say, why should I have to support a bunch of people who don’t work for theirs? This attitude is certain to soften for many as they see their own job prospects, and those of their children, fade into the worldwide credit crunch.

But as credit tightens and talk turns to recession or depression in the world economy, it’s not welfare for the poor that dominates discussion, but bailouts for the rich. After all, if General Motors is allowed to collapse, many thousands of Canadians will find themselves in dire straits. For the purposes of this narrative, it’s important to ignore the many thousands who already live in hopeless poverty.

Those who are appalled at the idea of forking out billions in taxpayers’ money to rescue failing corporations might take comfort in the knowledge that there’s nothing new in any of this. According to a report released this week by the Fraser Institute, Canadian companies have received $182 billion in “corporate welfare” in the past 12 years.

Corporate welfare, as defined by the Fraser Institute, a right-wing think-tank, means direct cash subsidies, and does not include the billions in tax cuts corporations have enjoyed during the same period. So while a succession of prime ministers have overseen a steady downward trend in support for the poor, they’ve managed to come up with a billion and a half dollars a year to prop up corporations.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper has spoken against what he calls “the trap” of the “available plethora of loans, grants, and subsidies” in the past, though he’s done little to put a stop to it since taking office. Now he’s musing about the necessity of bailing out the Big Three automakers, for fear of “(putting) our sector in severe disadvantage.”

It seems that, if the US hands the auto-giants a big bailout package, Canada will have no choice but to do the same, or risk sending the entire industry south. But there will be conditions attached. As Harper says, “There’s no blank cheque coming from the government of Canada.”

The question arises, what will those conditions be?

Imagine a world in which those bailouts were dependant on a commitment to produce energy-efficient cars in low-impact factories. Imagine a promise to restrict executive salaries, and to pay a fair share of taxes so that we don’t have to keep cutting services to the poor. Picture the Big Three promising to bring home all the manufacturing jobs they’ve already exported to China and Mexico.

OK, sorry to wander off into dreamland there. Judging from past performance Harper will no doubt want guarantees of wage reductions on the assembly line and limits on pay equity and workers’ rights to organize.

The Big Three will get their bailout, and others will follow. Canada will run deficits if need be to meet their demands. Later, to ensure that those deficits will be short- term and temporary, the government, whether Conservative or Liberal, will slash social spending. Canada’s desperate poor will become poorer still.

 It may not be fair, but it’s what we’ve always done.

Al Pope won the 2002 Ma Murray Award for Best Columnist in BC/Yukon. His novel, Bad Latitudes, is available in bookstores.

Just Posted

Child Development Centre marks 40 years of service

CDC now serves families throughout the territory

Triple J’s expands offerings with new skin care line

The products feature Canadian ingredients and environmentally-friendly packaging

Relatives of pedestrian struck in 2001 urge change after latest fatality at the intersection

‘I don’t know what the solution is, but I just think something needs to be done’

Whitehorse officials promise improvements to cycling routes

Commuters say more focus on the downtown is needed

WYATT’S WORLD

Wyatt’s World

Arctic Sports Inter-School Championship draws athletes from as far as Juneau

The three-day event included more than 300 participants from kindergarten to Grade 12

Access road to Telegraph Creek now open

Ministry has spent $300K to date on work to clear rockslide

Freedom Trails responds to lawsuit

A statement of defence was to the Yukon Supreme Court on Nov. 19.

Whitehorse RCMP seeking suspects after robbery at Yukon Inn

Robbery took place in early hours of Nov. 27, with suspects armed with a knife and “large stick”

Yukonomist: Your yogurt container’s dirty secret

You should still recycle, but recycling one might be giving you a false sense of environmental virtue

History Hunter: New book tells old story of nursing in the Yukon

Author Amy Wilson was a registered nurse in the Yukon from 1949 to 1951

Jack Hulland wins 2019 Yukon Elementary School Hockey Tournament

The one-day tournament featured nearly a dozen teams from Whitehorse, Dawson City and Teslin

City news, briefly

Some of the decisions that were made at the Nov. 25 Whitehorse city council meeting

Most Read