Aboriginal title and competitive advantage

We tend to think about land ownership in a black-and-white way. Either you own a piece of land, and can do whatever you want with it, or you don't. Reality is more complicated, and getting more so.

We tend to think about land ownership in a black-and-white way. Either you own a piece of land, and can do whatever you want with it, or you don’t.

Reality is more complicated, and getting more so. This has some potentially huge implications for the economy, particularly in rural areas of Canada where the resource economy is critical.

Thanks to some controversial court rulings, land tenure in Canada is catching a lot of attention. Izaak de Rijcke, a surveyor and legal expert who teaches at York University, gave such a mind-bending speech on the topic at a recent surveying conference in Winnipeg that Tim Keopke invited him to Whitehorse to speak about it last week.

De Rijcke started by reminding us that land ownership is different. If you own a watch, he said, you can do whatever you want with it. With land, however, there are layers of other interests that put “qualifiers” on your ownership. We are used to many of these. So used to them, in fact, we hardly even think in terms of how they limit our freedom to use and enjoy our land as we see fit.

You may own fee simple title to your land. But you don’t own the minerals underneath it (unlike some places in the U.S.). You might be zoned residential and not allowed to open a business. The power company might have an easement.

And we in the Yukon are familiar with other kinds of land tenure. You might have a trapping concession, which allows you to build a cabin and some trails but not much more. Or an outfitter concession, also allowing use of the land but not the construction of permanent luxury resort. Placer claims have their own set of rights to use the land, also different from fee simple ownership.

De Rijcke likens these to a stack of pancakes on a plate. The plate is the land, and each pancake is a different layer of “ownership” with some kind of right or power over the land.

This is where aboriginal title comes in. While news to many Canadians, the courts interpret it as a pancake in the stack that was always on the plate but unjustly ignored for decades by governments, business and individual Canadians.

Consider the Grace Islet dispute in B.C. Somebody bought the island in 1990. It was zoned “residential” at the time. The owner obtained a building permit in 2011 and started constructing a house.

It turns out that the island was used for centuries as a burial site by aboriginal people.

After the ensuing litigation and controversy, the half-constructed house was dismantled.

Legal scholars will debate these issues for years. For the rest of us in the real world, what does all this mean from an economic point of view?

For companies and entrepreneurs, it means that any business plan involving land is more complicated than 25 years ago. Just buying property and getting a building permit is not enough. The same is true for logging permits, mining permits, pipeline rights-of-way and so on. Ditto for leasing government land for, say, an eco-tourism resort.

You must now take into account the existence of the aboriginal title “pancake” in the stack.

This is fair, in my opinion. Our history is full of episodes where aboriginal rights and interests were trampled by non-aboriginal projects, many of which made far more money for their shareholders than was ever shared with local people.

Projects that don’t want to end up like the house on Grace Islet must build relationships with aboriginal people, share the benefits, and adjust their projects to mitigate local impacts.

Recent court cases are clearly “wins” for aboriginal people. They gain more control over the land in question, and can use this leverage to negotiate economic benefits or mitigate negative environmental impacts.

What does this mean for jobs and economic growth in the long run, for both aboriginal and non-aboriginal people?

The “bad news” scenario involves fears that unintended consequences will sideswipe the economy. Projects requiring access to land in rural parts of Canada will suffer a “freeze,” under this thinking, as claims of aboriginal title, lawsuits and lengthy negotiations add delay and uncertainty to business plans. The net effect would be less investment, fewer jobs and smaller business opportunities for all.

Remember that the rural areas of Canada, heavily dependent on resource industries, have already been suffering decades of stagnation. According to Statistics Canada, the population of “rural” Canada was 5.4 million people in 1951, while 8.6 million lived in urban areas. Fast forward to 2011, and rural Canada’s population had gone up just a fifth to 6.3 million. Over the same time, the urban population more than tripled to 27.1 million. Rural Canada doesn’t need anything that encourages more jobs and people to migrate to cities.

The “good news” scenario is that governments and big companies, finally, wrap their heads around aboriginal rights. They invest more time and money in building partnerships and working collaboratively with First Nations. Instead of being a growth-inhibitor, aboriginal title is a catalyst that leads to job-creating projects going ahead (with the benefits shared more fairly) rather than getting hung up for years in the courts.

It will likely play out differently in different parts of Canada. Your call is as good as mine as to which path the Yukon will go down.

Effective partnering with First Nations, including recognizing aboriginal title, will become a competitive advantage for provinces, territories and private companies. A project backed by an old-school company in an old-school province won’t get far enough to ever make money for its investors. A forward-looking company in a forward-looking jurisdiction would have a much better chance. Companies already have to deal with the uncertainties of zoning, environmental permits and tax changes. Handling aboriginal title would be similar: a challenge, but not one beyond a well-paid executive to resolve.

We in the Yukon have already seen some mining companies handle these issues much better than others, with a major effect on their business success.

De Rijcke called on our leaders, aboriginal and non-aboriginal, government and business, to move quickly to sort this out. It will require non-aboriginal governments and companies to do business in new ways. They will have to live the word “partnership” and not just put it in press releases. It will also require aboriginal leaders, if they haven’t already, to shift gears from winning in the courtroom to building institutions that foster growth and jobs in their regions. The biggest challenge of all may be that it requires lawyers on both sides to negotiate agreements that are clear and facilitate economic activity.

Our leaders should get started now to make the “good news” scenario a reality. If the “bad news” scenario plays out, you can expect to continue to see talented young people – aboriginal and non-aboriginal – move to the big cities in search of jobs.

Keith Halliday is a Yukon economist and author of the MacBride Museum’s Aurore of the Yukon series of historical children’s adventure novels. He won this year’s Ma Murray award for best columnist. You can follow him on Channel 9’s “Yukonomist” show or Twitter @hallidaykeith

Get local stories you won't find anywhere else right to your inbox.
Sign up here

Just Posted

During our recent conversation, John Nicholson showed me snapshots of his time working on the Yukon riverboats 70 years ago. (Michael Gates)
History Hunter: Yukon man relives the riverboat days after seven decades

John Nicholson took summer work on Yukon steamers in the 1950s

A city map shows the property at 107 Range Road. The zoning is now in place for developers to proceed with plans for a Dairy Queen drive-thru. If plans proceed on schedule the new restaurant is anticipated to open in October. (Cyrstal Schick/Yukon News)
October opening eyed for Dairy Queen

Will depend on everything going according to plan

NDP candidate Annie Blake, left, and Liberal incumbent Pauline Frost. (Submitted photos)
Official recount confirms tie vote in Vuntut Gwitchin riding

Both candidates Pauline Frost and Annie Blake are still standing with 78 votes each

Artist’s rendering of a Dairy Queen drive-thru. At its April 13 meeting, Whitehorse city council approved a zoning change to allow a drive-thru at 107 Range Road. Developers sought the change to build a Dairy Queen there. (Submitted)
Drive-thru approved by Whitehorse city council at 107 Range Road

Rezoning could pave the way for a Dairy Queen


Wyatt’s World for April 14, 2021.… Continue reading

Joel Krahn/joelkran.com Hikers traverse the Chilkoot Trail in September 2015. Alaska side.
The Canadian side of the Chilkoot Trail will open for summer

The Canadian side of the Chilkoot Trail will open for summer Parks… Continue reading

Whitehorse City Hall (Yukon News file)
City news, briefly

A look at city council matters for the week of April 12

École Whitehorse Elementary Grade 7 students Yumi Traynor and Oscar Wolosewich participated in the Civix Student Vote in Whitehorse on April 12. (Haley Ritchie/Yukon News)
Yukon Student Vote chooses Yukon Party government; NDP take popular vote

The initiative is organized by national non-profit CIVIX

Yvonne Clarke is the newly elected Yukon Party MLA for Porter Creek Centre. (Submitted/Yukon Party)
Yvonne Clarke elected as first Filipina MLA in the Yukon Legislative Assembly

Clarke beat incumbent Liberal Paolo Gallina in Porter Creek Centre

Emily Tredger at NDP election night headquarters after winning the Whitehorse Centre riding. (Stephanie Waddell/Yukon News)
Emily Tredger takes Whitehorse Centre for NDP

MLA-elect ready to get to work in new role

Chief Medical Officer of Health Dr. Brendan Hanley. (Crystal Schick/Yukon News)
Two new cases of COVID-19 variant identified in territory

“If variants were to get out of control in the Yukon, the impact could be serious.”

Today’s Mailbox: Rent freezes and the youth vote

Dear Editor, I read the article regarding the recommendations by the Yukon… Continue reading

Point-in-Time homeless count planned this month

Volunteers will count those in shelters, short-term housing and without shelter in a 24-hour period.

Most Read