So much for certainty

It seems nobody likes the Yukon government's long-awaited plan for the Peel watershed. Conservationists doubt that the plan, which leaves most of the watershed open to new staking...

It seems nobody likes the Yukon government’s long-awaited plan for the Peel watershed.

Conservationists doubt that the plan, which leaves most of the watershed open to new staking, will succeed in protecting the region’s wilderness character.

Miners, meanwhile, grumble that the plan will burden them with pricey conditions that would make projects in the region unprofitable.

As for First Nation chiefs, they intend to sue the territory for having fallen afoul of signed land-claim agreements in its less-than-forthright handling of the planning process.

A failure of this magnitude wasn’t the work of any single person. It was truly a team effort on the Yukon Party’s part.

Throughout the planning process, government ministers created the impression of feigning impartiality while doing everything in their power to tilt the field in favour of development. No wonder First Nation chiefs feel cheated.

The territory suppressed information that would support conservation efforts. Recall how our former premier, Dennis Fentie, yelled at senior government officials who dared to consider sharing valuable ecological data with planners – not expecting that documentation of this freak-out would be eventually made public in a report by this newspaper.

Later, under our current regime, the government refused to include any supporting numbers in its report on the final round of consultation – perhaps because those numbers indicated broad support for the planning commission’s final plan. When this newspaper dug up those excised numbers, Currie Dixon, the territory’s minister of environment and economic development, memorably declared that “the numbers don’t matter.”

The process also appeared to be gamed early on, when the government let miners engage in a staking free-for-all in the region under review, then later complained that protecting much of the region is impossible without upsetting those same miners.

Also consider all the silly word games played by the government to justify its actions. The Yukon continues to laughably assert that it has merely “modified” the recommended plan, as opposed to rejecting it.

Yet, at least when you look at how much new staking would be allowed, the government’s plan does pretty much the opposite of what the planning commission proposed. It suggested allowing new staking in 20 per cent of the watershed, while the government’s plan opens up about 70 per cent of the region to mineral exploration.

Similarly, the government continues to label areas open to development as “wilderness.” And government politicians still can’t quite bring themselves to say the word “mining” out loud in the context of the Peel. Instead, they continue to resort to the euphemism “balance.”

This mealy-mouthness has been broken up by the occasional flamboyant exaggeration. During the last election campaign, Premier Darrell Pasloski issued his over-the-top warning that protecting most of the Peel would bury the territory in an avalanche of lawsuits launched by miners with existing claims. (The evidence he later offered to support this claim is thin, to say the least.)

Later, Pasloski devoted more than two pages of a budget speech to demonizing conservationists, warning they wanted to essentially turn the whole territory into a park. So much for showing a little statesmanship on a complicated matter that required it.

Yet such punchiness is exceptional. Throughout most of the Peel ordeal, the Yukon Party has typically lacked the courage to say what it means. That, more than anything, is probably what doomed the process.

Maybe if the government hadn’t waited until the planning commission had wrapped up its work to actually say much concrete about what it wanted, there wouldn’t now be such a pervasive sense that the game had been rigged all along. But it’s too late to change that now.

Affected First Nations extinguished their aboriginal rights to the whole region in exchange for things like collaborative land-use planning. The government, for its part, won through land-claim agreements the ability to tell industry it had legal certainty for development. But, thanks to the government’s abuse of the land-use planning process, that’s now out the window.

Thomas Berger, the esteemed lawyer who helped invent the field of aboriginal law in Canada, is helping First Nations with their case over the Peel. Who knows how long this mess will take to unravel, as cases are appealed all the way up to the Supreme Court of Canada.

In the meantime, this legal uncertainty ensures that a huge swath of the Yukon will not see any development any time soon. In a strange way, the Yukon Party has done the work of conservationists for them.

Get local stories you won't find anywhere else right to your inbox.
Sign up here

Just Posted

NDP candidate Annie Blake, left, and Liberal incumbent Pauline Frost. (Submitted photos)
Official recount confirms tie vote in Vuntut Gwitchin riding

Both candidates Pauline Frost and Annie Blake are still standing with 78 votes each

Artist’s rendering of a Dairy Queen drive-thru. At its April 13 meeting, Whitehorse city council approved a zoning change to allow a drive-thru at 107 Range Road. Developers sought the change to build a Dairy Queen there. (Submitted)
Drive-thru approved by Whitehorse city council at 107 Range Road

Rezoning could pave the way for a Dairy Queen


Wyatt’s World for April 14, 2021.… Continue reading

Liberal leader Sandy Silver speaks outside his campaign headquarters in Dawson City following early poll results on April 12. (Robin Sharp/Yukon News)
UPDATED: Minority government results will wait on tie vote in Vuntut Gwitchin

The Yukon Party and the Liberal Party currently have secured the same amount of seats

École Whitehorse Elementary Grade 7 students Yumi Traynor and Oscar Wolosewich participated in the Civix Student Vote in Whitehorse on April 12. (Haley Ritchie/Yukon News)
Yukon Student Vote chooses Yukon Party government; NDP take popular vote

The initiative is organized by national non-profit CIVIX

Yvonne Clarke is the newly elected Yukon Party MLA for Porter Creek Centre. (Submitted/Yukon Party)
Yvonne Clarke elected as first Filipina MLA in the Yukon Legislative Assembly

Clarke beat incumbent Liberal Paolo Gallina in Porter Creek Centre

Emily Tredger at NDP election night headquarters after winning the Whitehorse Centre riding. (Stephanie Waddell/Yukon News)
Emily Tredger takes Whitehorse Centre for NDP

MLA-elect ready to get to work in new role

Chief Medical Officer of Health Dr. Brendan Hanley. (Crystal Schick/Yukon News)
Two new cases of COVID-19 variant identified in territory

“If variants were to get out of control in the Yukon, the impact could be serious.”

Today’s Mailbox: Rent freezes and the youth vote

Dear Editor, I read the article regarding the recommendations by the Yukon… Continue reading

Point-in-Time homeless count planned this month

Volunteers will count those in shelters, short-term housing and without shelter in a 24-hour period.

The Yukon’s new ATIPP Act came into effect on April 1. Yukoners can submit ATIPP requests online or at the Legislative Assembly building. (Gabrielle Plonka/Yukon News file)
New ATIPP Act in effect as of April 1

The changes promise increased government transparency

A new conservancy in northern B.C. is adjacent to Mount Edziza Provincial Park. (Courtesy BC Parks)
Ice Mountain Lands near Telegraph Creek, B.C., granted conservancy protection

The conservancy is the first step in a multi-year Tahltan Stewardship Initiative

Most Read