No end in sight to Peel mess

At the risk of being a killjoy, it's probably important to note that the Peel trial is unlikely to resolve anything of substance. Not this week's trial, anyhow.

At the risk of being a killjoy, it’s probably important to note that the Peel trial is unlikely to resolve anything of substance. Not this week’s trial, anyhow. Regardless of how Justice Ron Veale rules, the decision looks bound to be appealed all the way up to the Supreme Court of Canada, which ought to prolong this long-running political disaster for at least another few years yet.

The betting odds are not in the Yukon government’s favour. First Nations usually win resource battles when they hit the courts, and it’s hard to see why the Peel case, which concerns the land-use plan for a great swath of northeast Yukon that’s the size of Vancouver Island, would be any different.

Maybe the Yukon government, as it insists, followed the letter of the Peel planning process. It still seems clear it violated its spirit. Chiefs didn’t sign away their unextinguished aboriginal rights and engage in seven years of planning talks to be subjected to the kind of skullduggery seen at the final hour of the planning talks, when the Yukon government tore up the plan that was the culmination of negotiations and replace it with pretty much the opposite of what had been discussed, with the proportion of protected areas flipped on its head to allow mining in much of the watershed.

The appropriate moment for the government to spell out what it wanted in the Peel would have been at the beginning, rather than the end, of this long process. At the very least, the territory should have clearly explained it couldn’t stomach the commission’s conservation-heavy recommended plan, and provided a clear alternative. Instead, the resources minister of the day, Patrick Rouble, only issued a mealy-mouthed response that failed to clearly articulate what the government obviously wanted – namely, way more mining.

Rouble never had the courage to say as much aloud. Instead, he’d resort to euphemisms about “balance,” while never bothering to explain what proportion of protected areas would be reasonable, or to point out which plum areas for mining should remain open for development. It would fall on Rouble’s successor, following the territorial election, to explain all this, once the planning commission completed its work.

The government’s lawyer, John Hunter, now asserts that the planning commission failed to make tough decisions. That’s a bit rich. It is the Yukon government, we should remember, that spent the planning process and the following territorial election assuring the public that it could develop a Peel plan that would be all things to all people. It was the planning commission that insisted that tough trade-offs were needed, as you can’t always please both wilderness paddlers and First Nation residents, who value the area’s untouched wilderness, along with miners, who seek to dig the place up in pursuit of shiny metal. So which side was the one being, in Hunter’s words, facile and specious?

Now Veale and future judges who will rule on the case are saddled with the tough job of finding a solution.

First Nations want the courts to impose the planning commission’s final recommended plan. But a judge would need to dance around the bit in the Umbrella Final Agreement that says that the Yukon government, at the end of the day, has final say over the plan as it applies to Crown land – which, in the Peel, is nearly the whole region. So the courts may have to choose between defending the spirit of agreements and violating the letter, or vice versa.

Thomas Berger, the renowned aboriginal rights lawyer representing the plaintiffs, has proposed one way out of this tangle: the courts could send the parties back a few steps, to when the final recommended plan was supposed to undergo a public review. Berger reasons that the territory gave up its right to substantially modify the plan when it held its tongue earlier, so the government in this scenario would be unable to make any big changes to the recommended plan, but it could still tinker around the edges.

That’s really just a fancy way of tying the territory’s hands. But without doing so, what assurances would First Nations have that the government would behave any better the next time around? Of course, by the time such an option is pursued, we may well have a different government in power, which could solve a whole lot.

Maybe the Yukon Party could have gotten off the hook by actually acknowledging it had rejected, rather than modified, the final recommendations. But that would have required admitting that nearly a decade of talks had been wasted, and that efforts at reconciling the historic grievances of First Nations currently face a big setback.

Which, of course, is the case. But if the Yukon Party has shown a pattern of behaviour, it’s to ignore problems and pretend that everything is hunky dory. Admitting failure would have been uncharacteristically honest.

It seems clear that Yukon’s land claims agreements, written under the perhaps naive assumption that governments would engage in good-faith bargaining, were not designed to take this kind of abuse.

Until some faraway resolution is reached, the territory has accomplished precisely the opposite effect it had intended: no miner in his right mind will sink serious money into developing a property in the Peel, given the legal uncertainty that hangs over the entire region. Well done, sirs.

Get local stories you won't find anywhere else right to your inbox.
Sign up here

Just Posted

Chief Medical Officer of Health Dr. Brendan Hanley gives a COVID-19 update during a press conference in Whitehorse on May 26. The Yukon government announced two new cases of COVID-19 in the territory with a press release on Oct. 19. (Alistair Maitland Photography)
Two new cases of COVID-19 announced in Yukon

Contact tracing is complete and YG says there is no increased risk to the public

Yukon Energy in Whitehorse on April 8. Yukon Energy faced a potential “critical” fuel shortage in January due to an avalanche blocking a shipping route from Skagway to the Yukon, according to an email obtained by the Yukon Party and questioned in the legislature on Oct. 14. (Crystal Schick/Yukon News file)
Yukon Energy faced ‘critical’ fuel shortage last January due to avalanche

An email obtained by the Yukon Party showed energy officials were concerned

Jeanie McLean (formerly Dendys), the minister responsible for the Women’s Directorate speaks during legislative assembly in Whitehorse on Nov. 27, 2017. “Our government is proud to be supporting Yukon’s grassroots organizations and First Nation governments in this critical work,” said McLean of the $175,000 from the Yukon government awarded to four community-based projects aimed at preventing violence against Indigenous women. (Crystal Schick/Yukon News file)
Yukon government gives $175k to projects aimed at preventing violence against Indigenous women

Four projects were supported via the Prevention of Violence against Aboriginal Women Fund

Yukonomist Keith Halliday
Yukonomist: You don’t know what you’ve got ‘til it’s gone

When I was a kid, CP Air had a monopoly on flights… Continue reading

EDITORIAL: Don’t let the City of Whitehorse distract you

A little over two weeks after Whitehorse city council voted to give… Continue reading

Whitehorse City Hall. (Joel Krahn/Yukon News file)
City hall, briefly

A look at decisions made by Whitehorse city council this week

Northwestel has released the proposed prices for its unlimited plans. Unlimited internet in Whitehorse and Carcross could cost users between $160.95 and $249.95 per month depending on their choice of package. (Yukon News file)
Unlimited internet options outlined

Will require CRTC approval before Northwestel makes them available

Legislative assembly on the last day of the fall sitting in Whitehorse. Yukon’s territorial government will sit for 45 days this sitting instead of 30 days to make up for lost time caused by COVID-19 in the spring. (Crystal Schick/Yukon News file)
Legislative assembly sitting extended

Yukon’s territorial government will sit for 45 days this sitting. The extension… Continue reading

Today’s mailbox: Mad about MAD

Letters to the editor published Oct. 16, 2020

Alkan Air hangar in Whitehorse. Alkan Air has filed its response to a lawsuit over a 2019 plane crash that killed a Vancouver geologist on board, denying that there was any negligence on its part or the pilot’s. (Crystal Schick/Yukon News file)
Alkan Air responds to lawsuit over 2019 crash denying negligence, liability

Airline filed statement of defence Oct. 7 to lawsuit by spouse of geologist killed in crash

Whitehorse city council members voted Oct. 13 to decline an increase to their base salaries that was set to be made on Jan. 1. (Crystal Schick/Yukon News file)
Council declines increased wages for 2021

Members will not have wages adjusted for CPI

A vehicle is seen along Mount Sima Road in Whitehorse on May 12. At its Oct. 13 meeting, Whitehorse city council approved the third reading for two separate bylaws that will allow the land sale and transfer agreements of city-owned land — a 127-square-metre piece next to 75 Ortona Ave. and 1.02 hectares of property behind three lots on Mount Sima Road. (Crystal Schick/Yukon News file)
Whitehorse properties could soon expand

Land sale agreements approved by council

Most Read