It’s back to the drawing board for the Peel

The Yukon government has largely gotten its way in its appeal of the Peel watershed land use planning case.

The Yukon government has largely gotten its way in its appeal of the Peel watershed land use planning case.

The government’s own plan, which essentially inverted the planning commission’s recommendations by opening much of the remote region to mining, remains invalid, the Court of Appeal ruled this morning.

But the government is allowed, as it wanted, to go back to an earlier step in the planning process to “articulate its priorities in a valid matter.” And the territory won’t be bound by the restrictions put in place by a Yukon Supreme Court judge.

The panel of appeal judges ruled “Yukon undermined reconciliation by failing to honour the letter and spirit of its treaty obligations” when it released its plan for the 68,000 square kilometres of mostly undisturbed Yukon wilderness that was dramatically different from the 80 per cent protection recommended by the Peel land use planning commission.

The government didn’t provide adequate information explaining what changes it wanted during the consultation stage and “undermined the dialogue central to the plan for reconciliation.”

Still, they should be allowed to try again, the court ruled.

In 2011, then-resource minister Patrick Rouble wrote a letter to the commission, asking for a land-use plan with more balance and greater options for access. But the letter lacked many details, such as how much of the watershed should be protected or left open to development.

In the original Yukon Supreme Court decision last year, Justice Ron Veale quashed the government’s plan and ruled it couldn’t return to an earlier stage in the process to discuss those issues because this would allow it to “benefit from its flawed process.”

The Appeal Court disagreed.

Sending things back is not giving the Yukon government undue benefits, it said, it’s simply allowing “the process to unfold as it was meant to.”

The government must consult on the recommended plan and provide more details on the changes it wants to make.

They can’t just submit the same plan that led to the lawsuit, but other than that there are no limitations.

“With respect, it is not the court’s role to speculate on the extent to which any final plan emerging from a properly completed process would mirror Yukon’s Final Plan.”

The appeal pitted the Yukon government against three First Nations – the Nacho Nyak Dun, Tr’ondek Hwech’in and Vuntut Gwitchin – and environmental groups. They were represented by aboriginal law pioneer Thomas Berger.

The government has always insisted that it was simply “modifying” the recommended plan, something that the Umbrella Final Agreement allows it to do.

Berger argued the changes were far from a modification, because they make dramatic changes that the government never even talked about during the consultation process.

See Friday’s Yukon News for more.

Contact Ashley Joannou at

ashleyj@yukon-news.com

Just Posted

Silver rules out HST, layoffs and royalty changes

Yukon’s financial advisory panel has released its final report

City of Whitehorse budgets $30M for infrastructure over four years

‘I think we’re concentrating on the most important things’

Yukon community liaison for MMIWG inquiry fired

Melissa Carlick, the Whitehorse-based community liaison officer for the national Missing and… Continue reading

Yukon man holds no grudge after being attacked by bison

‘The poor guy was only trying to fend off someone who he knew was trying to kill him’

Straight and true: the story of the Yukon colours

Michael Gates | History Hunter Last week, I participated in the 150th… Continue reading

Get ready to tumble: Whitehorse’s Polarettes to flip out at fundraiser

‘There’s a mandatory five-minute break at the end, just so people don’t fall over’

Alaska’s governor goes to China

There are very different rules for resource projects depending on which side of the border you’re on

Yukon survey shows broad support for legal pot

But there’s no consensus on retail and distribution models

Yukon government releases survey on the territory’s liquor laws

Changes could include allowing sale of booze in grocery stores

Get family consent before moving patients to other hospitals: NDP critic

‘Where is the respect and where is the dignity?’

Bill C-17 passes third reading in House of Commons

The bill, which will repeal controversial amendments made to YESAA by Bill S-6, will now go to Senate

White Pass and Yukon Route musical chugs on without director

The cast and crew of Stonecliff are pushing forward without Conrad Boyce, who went on medical leave

Most Read